10 songs that feel like Listening in Depth
Matched to Listening in Depth by Labradford on how the music actually moves — intensity, dynamic swing, texture, tempo — not by genre tag. Here's what makes each one a match.
A 96% feel-match — carries the same serene pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (36/100).
96% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (35/100). Same layered texture.
Keeps the same serene pull — lands at almost exactly the same energy (35/100). Measured 96% alike. Nearly the same tempo, too (70 BPM).
Measures 95% the same. It lands at almost exactly the same energy (38/100). Same layered texture.
A 95% feel-match — carries the same serene pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (36/100).
95% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (36/100). Same layered texture.
Keeps the same serene pull — lands at almost exactly the same energy (36/100). Measured 95% alike.
Measures 95% the same. It lands at almost exactly the same energy (37/100). Same layered texture.
A 94% feel-match — carries the same serene pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (40/100).
94% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (40/100). Same layered texture.
…and if you want it calmer
Same feeling, measured gentler — for when Listening in Depth is more than you want right now.
Keeps the same feel of the original, but its dynamic range stays a gentler 4 where the original climbs to 6. Intensity 12/100, down from 35. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Its dynamic range stays a gentler 3 where the original climbs to 6, so it lands at 13/100 — the pull without the edge. Nearly the same tempo, too.
If it's the same feel you're after, this delivers it while its dynamic range stays a gentler 2 where the original climbs to 6. Reads 5/100. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Holds the same feel while its dynamic range stays a gentler 2 where the original climbs to 6. 7/100, versus the original's 35. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Keeps the same feel of the original, but its dynamic range stays a gentler 2 where the original climbs to 6. Intensity 5/100, down from 35. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Its dynamic range stays a gentler 3 where the original climbs to 6, so it lands at 11/100 — the pull without the edge.
If it's the same feel you're after, this delivers it while its dynamic range stays a gentler 3 where the original climbs to 6. Reads 8/100. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Holds the same feel while its dynamic range stays a gentler 3 where the original climbs to 6. 8/100, versus the original's 35. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Frequently asked
What songs sound like “Listening in Depth” by Labradford?
The closest feel-matches we measure are “5000” by Bonobo, “Handwriting” by Rachel's, “Which Way Is East” by Charles Lloyd — the top match scores 96% alike. Matching is by how the songs actually move (intensity, dynamic range, texture, tempo, predictability, vocal force), not by genre tag or popularity.
What songs are like “Listening in Depth” but calmer?
“An Ending (Ascent)” by Brian Eno, “Music for Airports” by Brian Eno, “1/1” by Brian Eno keep a similar feel while measuring gentler — lower dynamic swing, fewer sudden shifts, or a calmer overall level.
How intense is “Listening in Depth”?
It measures 35/100 on our intensity scale, computed from a dynamic range of 6/10, layered texture, mild sudden shifts, and instrumental. Tempo is 70 BPM.
How do you decide which songs are similar?
Every song in our catalog is measured on 8 dimensions — intensity, dynamic range, tempo, sudden changes, texture, predictability, vocal force and fine sound detail. Similarity is the distance between two songs across those measurements, so matches cross genres and eras. Shared mood tags break ties.
By the numbers: how this song compares
Computed from this song’s place among the 19,209 songs we’ve measured.
Where it sits in 19,000 songs
On our 19k-song scale this lands in the middle band — more energetic than 23% of songs, calmer than the other 77%. Its intensity reading of 35/100 comes from a dynamic range of 6/10, layered texture, mild shifts, and instrumental. It shares this stretch of the spectrum with thousands of other tracks, so the finer fingerprint below is what really separates it.
What makes it unusual
What stands out most about this song is a slow, unhurried pace: more extreme on that axis than 96% of everything we've measured. At the far opposite end of the library sit the songs built on full chaos — sudden changes, huge quiet-to-loud swings, and relentless energy — the kind of track this one is the counterpoint to.
Feels almost identical to
Closest matches by feel across all 19,209 measured songs — not by genre or artist, by how they actually move.
What it’s good for
Scored from this song’s tempo, intensity, dynamics and texture — not crowd votes.
1996 in context
The 309 songs we’ve measured from 1996 average a dynamic range of 6.4/10. At 6/10, this track is right in line with its year.
Mixes smoothly with
Within a few BPM and close in feel — they flow without a jarring transition.
The fingerprint
The 8-dimension measurement behind every rating on this page.
Want the single closest match, with every dimension compared?
Find its sonic twin →